Help Support Home Health Amendments in MA House Budget

A new email message is available on the HCA Legislative Action Center that anyone can send to their local state representatives to help support amendments to the FY12 House budget proposal benefiting home health care.

For those unfamiliar with the Alliance’s advocacy emails, the messages are pre-written and will automatically go to the legislator based on the contact information submitted. Once that information is entered, the message is available for review and can be sent and shared with colleagues, friends, and anyone else interested in taking action.

For those preferring to call their elected officials, but may not have their contact information or know who their state rep is, you can type in your information here to find out.

Below is a list of amendments the Home Care Alliance is supporting:

  • Amendment 529: Pediatric Home Care Services, filed by Rep. Michael Brady.

~This amendment does not increase any rate, but merely shifts existing payment recognizing a home health agency’s administrative requirements. Also, this amendment ensures safety and quality by allowing only registered nurses to care for multiple patients in a single setting.

  • Amendment 554: Patient Care Transitions, filed by Rep. Kevin Honan.

~This amendment establishes a special MassHealth rate to reward home health agencies that are successful in helping patients discharged from acute care to avoid a costly re-hospitalization for the same condition for which they were originally hospitalized.

~The hospitalization would have to be avoided for at least 30 days in order for the payment to be administered. The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall determine the rate, which will be based on a nurse-led team model.

  • Amendment 339: Home Health Payment Rates, filed by Rep. David Sullivan.

~The MassHealth home health payment rate was cut by 20 percent to patients receiving skilled nursing care past 60 days of care in December of 2008. This created a new payment category for patients that require longer periods of care and who are at a greater risk of inpatient facility admissions or readmissions. This amendment would restore that rate.

  • Amendment 681: Telehealth Reimbursement, filed by Rep. John Mahoney.

~This amendment would establish MassHealth reimbursement for telehealth (remote patient monitoring) technology.
~Telehealth and remote care management programs are not only proven to reduce admissions to hospitals and nursing homes, but also reduce the frequency of home health visits.

  • Amendment 131: Adult Day Health Services, filed by Rep. Alice Wolf.

~A $55 million cut to ADH services was proposed in the Governor’s budget and this amendment would freeze the level of reimbursement to prevent that from occurring. The amendment would also impose a moratorium on new ADH facilities.

See the full list of House budget amendments here.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

Helpful Q&As Posted on Care Transitions Program

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has recently posted new Question & Answers regarding the Community-Based Care Transitions Program.

One such question that has emerged from multiple home health agencies concerns what constitutes a “community-based organization” or CBO.  See below for a pair of Q&A’s offering guidance:

  • Q: Does a home health provider qualify as a Community-Based Organization (CBO)? 
  • A: A home health agency would only qualify as a CBO if it was based in the community it proposed to serve and had a governing body with broad community representation of multiple health care stakeholders, including consumers. To ensure broad stakeholder involvement, 50% of the board representation should come from outside the home health agency.  Please also see our response to FAQ# 10418 for guidance on consumer representation.
  • Q (#10418 from above): Does a coalition representing a collaboration of community healthcare providers (medical centers, Federal Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), health plans, educational leaders and local government) qualify as a Community-Based Organization (CBO)?
  • A: If the coalition is (1) a legal entity, such as a 501(c) (3) organization or other organization that has a taxpayer identification number and can accept payment, (2) has a governing body that includes broad community representation of multiple health care stakeholders, including consumers and (3) is physically located in the community it proposes to serve, then it could qualify as a CBO.  In addition, there must be adequate consumer representation on the governing board with voting rights. The consumers may not be providers or immediate family members of providers to satisfy this requirement.

See the full list of Q&A’s relative to this program here.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

Care Transitions Program Part of Partnership for Patients

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Don Berwick and US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced a massive initiative and federal funding opportunity dubbed the “Partnership for Patients.”

This billion dollar commitment from the federal government will be split between two goals:

  • Keep patients from getting injured or sicker. By the end of 2013, preventable hospital-acquired conditions would decrease by 40% compared to 2010.
  • Help patients heal without complication. By the end of 2013, preventable complications during a transition from one care setting to another would be decreased so that all hospital readmissions would be reduced by 20% compared to 2010.

Home health agencies will be most interested in the Community-Based Care Transitions Program, which will spread $500 million in funding to community-based organizations partnering with eligible hospitals for care transition services that include timely, culturally, and linguistically-competent post-discharge education, medication review and management, and patient-centered self-management support within 24 hours of discharge.

Recently, the solicitation and application have been released after months of waiting and the Home Care Alliance is continuing to encourage eligible agencies that qualify as Community-Based Organizations (CBO’s) to partner with hospitals, ASAP’s, and other providers to submit an application.

Here is the list of pertinent documents for this program:

Agencies that have any questions regarding this program can contact the Home Care Alliance.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

Mass. House Ways & Means Budget Announced

The Massachusetts House Committee on Ways & Means released their version of the state budget earlier today and this will set the stage for the full House of Representatives to debate the bill in the next couple of weeks.

All MassHealth items remained level from the Governor’s proposed budget, which was released in January. That includes the following items:

  • MassHealth Senior Care at $2,495,602,264
  • MassHealth Fee-for-Service Payments: $2,026,206,633
  • MassHealth Managed Care: $3,872,835,669

The proposed $55 million cut to Adult Day Health Services was not repaired in this version, although there is general support in the legislature for overturning it and at least one Representative has committed to filing an amendment that would freeze rates and service levels while also imposing a moratorium on new programs and program expansions. A group of advocates led by the Massachusetts Adult Day Services Association, and including the Home Care Alliance, are working on the issue.

Under the Executive Office of Elder Affairs, the Home Care Purchased Services line item received a $1 million boost while all other items remained level.

The Home Care Alliance will be working with state representatives to file amendments on issues important to home health agencies and will provide updates including how agencies, patients, and families can help gain support for the Alliance’s budget proposals.

Return to www.thinkhomcare.org.

The Case Against a Medicare Home Health Copayment

At our recent meeting with representatives from our state’s  Congressional delegation, Rey Spadoni, President/CEO of the VNA of Boston made some important remarks on the perils presented to home care patients should the MEDPAC proposal – presented to Congress in March –  for a per episode copayment to be enacted on home health services.  Calling copayments “short-sighted” and “ineffective,  Rey has this to say about the reaction from his staff in the field:

When our nurses, who care for patients in the poorest neighborhoods of Boston, hear about this suggestion… they roll their eyes and tell us that most… most… of their patients will not pay them. They will prioritize paying for their prescriptions, their rent and food before they will pay for home care services. For most of our patients, age 80 and above, they are already spending 30% of their limited incomes on uncovered medical care.

The battle to stop a home care copayment  has been successfully fought by this industry before. But this year, it feels a little different. MEDPAC’s copayment call has been embraced by the Congressional Budget Office; and with talk of major Medicare reform on at least the Tea Party’s agenda, copayments in the name of more “personal responsibility” for health care purchasing may have a new and receptive audience.

Although the President resisted the recommendation in his budget proposal, it is clear that this possible wave of change will need “all hands on deck” to stop.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

CMS Releases Proposed Rule on ACOs

A proposed rule has been released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for comment regarding the formation of Accountable Care Organizations or ACO’s, which create incentives for health care providers to work together to treat an individual patient across care settings.

Section 3022 of the Affordable Care Act created the Medicare Shared Savings Program that is intended to encourage providers of services and suppliers to create a new type of health care entity, which the statute calls an Accountable Care Organization. The proposed rule mentions home health, but it is important that comments on the rule are submitted to ensure that home health agencies are active participants in every ACO. Given the ACO initiative’s mission of caring for patients more efficiently and at a lower cost, this is an excellent opportunity for agencies to speak up.

The proposed rule was released on March 31 and comments will be accepted by CMS for 60 days.  You can comment:

  • By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following address ONLY:

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services,
Attention: CMS-1345-P,
P.O. Box 8013,
Baltimore, MD 21244-8013.

Below is the full announcement from CMS on the Medicare Shared Savings Program that includes a summery of the Affordable Care Act provision on ACO’s and some information from the proposed rule.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED RULE PROVISIONS FOR ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS UNDER THE MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS PROGRAM

Overview

On March 31, 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), proposed new rules under the Affordable Care Act to help doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers better coordinate care for Medicare patients through Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).  ACOs create incentives for health care providers to work together to treat an individual patient across care settings – including doctor’s offices, hospitals, and long-term care facilities.  The Medicare Shared Savings Program will reward ACOs that lower growth in health care costs while meeting performance standards on quality of care and putting patients first.  Patient and provider participation in an ACO is purely voluntary.

In developing the proposed rule, CMS has worked closely with agencies across the Federal government to ensure a coordinated and aligned inter- and intra-agency effort to facilitate implementation of the Medicare Shared Savings Program (Shared Savings Program).

This fact sheet describes the proposals addressing the proposals for what ACOs are, how they can be created, and other general topics.  CMS has posted separate fact sheets on its web site to address in greater detail specific aspects of the proposed rule, such as the quality measures and performance scoring.

There will be a 60 day public comment period on this proposed rule. CMS encourages all interested members of the public, including providers, suppliers, and Medicare beneficiaries to submit comments so that CMS can consider them as it develops final regulations on the program.

Background:

Section 3022 of the Affordable Care Act, added a new section 1899 to the Social Security Act (the Act) that requires the Secretary to establish the Shared Savings Program by January 1, 2012.  This program is intended to encourage providers of services and suppliers (e.g., physicians, hospitals and others involved in patient care) to create a new type of health care entity, which the statute calls an “Accountable Care Organization (ACO)” that agrees to be held accountable for improving the health and experience of care for individuals and improving the health of populations while reducing the rate of growth in health care spending.  Studies have shown that better care often costs less, because coordinated care helps to ensure that the patient receives the right care at the right time, with the goal of avoiding unnecessary duplication of services and preventing medical errors.

ACOs and the Medicare Beneficiary:

An ACO provides an opportunity for Medicare beneficiaries to receive high quality evidence-based health care that eliminates waste and reduces excessive costs through improved care delivery.   However, there would be significant differences between ACOs, as described in the proposed rule and the private managed care plans offered under the Medicare Advantage program.  Beneficiaries would not enroll in a specific ACO.  Instead the proposed rule calls for Medicare to take a retrospective look at the beneficiary’s use of services to determine whether a particular ACO should be credited with improving care and reducing expenditures.  This means that an ACO would have an incentive to improve the quality of care for all patients seen by its member providers and suppliers.

The proposed rule would require providers participating in an ACO to notify the beneficiary that they are participating in an ACO, and that the provider will be eligible for additional Medicare payments for improving the quality of care the beneficiary receives while reducing overall costs or may be financially responsible to Medicare for failing to provide efficient, cost-effective care.  The beneficiary may then choose to receive services from the provider or seek care from another provider that is not part of the ACO.

The proposed rule would also require each provider in an ACO to notify the beneficiary that the beneficiary’s claims data may be shared with the ACO. This data sharing is intended to make it easier to coordinate the beneficiary’s care; however, the provider may not require a beneficiary to obtain services from another provider or supplier in the same ACO.  The provider must give the beneficiary the opportunity to opt-out of those data sharing arrangements.  For Medicare beneficiaries who choose not to opt-out of the data sharing arrangements, the proposed rule would limit data sharing to the purposes of the Shared Savings Program and would require compliance with applicable   privacy rules and regulations, including the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).

Proposed eligibility requirements for an ACO:

Under the proposed rule, an ACO refers to a group of providers and suppliers of services (e.g., hospitals, physicians, and others involved in patient care) that will work together to coordinate care for the Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries they serve. The goal of an ACO is to deliver seamless, high quality care for Medicare beneficiaries, instead of the fragmented care that has so often been part of fee-for-service health care.  The ACO would be a patient-centered organization where the patient and providers are true partners in care decisions.

The Affordable Care Act specifies that an ACO may include the following types of groups of providers and suppliers of Medicare-covered services:

  • ACO professionals (i.e., physicians and hospitals meeting the statutory definition) in group practice arrangements,
  • Networks of individual practices of ACO professionals,
  • Partnerships or joint ventures arrangements between hospitals and ACO professionals, or
  • Hospitals employing ACO professionals.
  • Other Medicare providers and suppliers as determined by the Secretary

In the proposed rule, the Secretary has used her discretion to add certain critical access hospitals as eligible to participate in the Shared Savings Program.

The statute also requires each ACO to establish a governing body representing ACO providers of services and suppliers and Medicare beneficiaries. The proposed rule would make each ACO responsible for routine self-assessment, monitoring and reporting of the care it delivers.

To participate in the Shared Savings Program, the proposed rule would require an ACO to complete an application providing the information requested by CMS, including how the ACO plans to deliver high quality care at lower costs for the beneficiaries it serves.  As proposed, the ACO must agree to accept responsibility for at least 5,000 beneficiaries.  If the application is approved, the ACO must sign an agreement with CMS to participate in the Shared Savings Program for a period of three years.   An ACO will not be automatically accepted into the Shared Savings Program.

The proposed rule outlines a monitoring plan that includes analyzing claims and specific financial and quality data as well as the quarterly and annual aggregated reports, performing site visits, and performing beneficiary surveys.

Under the proposed rule, there are a number of circumstances under which CMS may terminate the agreement with an ACO, including avoidance of at risk beneficiaries and failure to meet the quality performance standards.

Tying payment to improved care at lower cost:

Under the proposed rule, Medicare would continue to pay individual providers and suppliers for specific items and services as it currently does under the fee-for-service payment systems.  The proposed rule would require CMS to develop a benchmark for savings to be achieved by each ACO if the ACO is to receive shared savings, or be held liable for losses.  Additionally, an ACO would be accountable for meeting or exceeding the quality performance standards to be eligible to receive any shared savings.

The proposed rule would establish quality performance measures and a methodology for linking quality and financial performance that will set a high bar on delivering coordinated and patient-centered care by ACOs, and emphasize continuous improvement around the three-part aim of better care for individuals, better health for populations, and lower growth in expenditures.  The proposed rule would require the ACO to have in place procedures and processes to promote evidence-based medicine and beneficiary engagement in their care.  The proposed rule would require ACOs to report quality measures to CMS and give timely feedback to providers.  CMS expects that ACOs will invest continually in the workforce and in team-based care. To assure program transparency, the proposed rule would require ACOs to publicly report certain aspects of their performance and operations.

Under the proposed rule, an ACO that meets the program’s quality performance standards would be eligible to receive a share of the savings it generates below a specific expenditure benchmark that would be set by CMS for each ACO. The proposed rule would also hold ACOs accountable for downside risk by requiring ACOs to repay Medicare for a portion of losses (expenditures above its benchmark). To provide an entry point for organizations with varied levels of experience with and willingness to take on risk, the proposed rule would allow an ACO to choose one of two program tracks.  The first track would allow an ACO to operate on a shared savings only track for the first two years, but would then require the ACO to assume the risk for shared losses in the third year.  The second track would allow ACOs to share in savings and risk liability for losses beginning in their first performance year, in return for a higher share of any savings it generates.

The Shared Savings Program NPRM will appear in the April 7, 2011 issue of the Federal Register.  CMS will accept comments on the proposed rule until June 6, 2011, and will respond to them in a final rule to be issued later this year.  The Shared Savings Program will begin operating on January 1, 2012.

Please Note: Once the regulation is published on (April 7, 2011) the preceding link will be deactivated and the published version of the regulation will be available on the National Archives website at

http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/news.html.

*************************************************************

IMPROVING QUALITY OF CARE FOR MEDICARE PATIENTS: ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS

On March 31, 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), proposed new rules under the Affordable Care Act to help doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers better coordinate care for Medicare patients through Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).  ACOs create incentives for health care providers to work together to treat an individual patient across care settings – including doctor’s offices, hospitals, and long-term care facilities.  The Medicare Shared Savings Program will reward ACOs that lower growth in health care costs while meeting performance standards on quality of care and putting patients first.  Patient and provider participation in an ACO is purely voluntary.

This fact sheet describes the proposals to ensure that ACOs provide high quality care, including proposed quality measures, and a proposed method for scoring the performance of the ACO for purposes of the Shared Savings Program. There will be a 60 day public comment period on this proposed rule. CMS encourages all interested members of the public, including providers, suppliers, and Medicare beneficiaries to submit comments so that CMS can consider them as it develops final regulations on the program.

Background:

The Medicare Shared Savings Program, which is to be implemented on January 1, 2012, is intended to encourage providers of services and suppliers (e.g., physicians, hospitals and others involved in patient care) to coordinate patient care and improve communications with each other to get each beneficiary the right care at the right time, and see that the care is provided right the first time.  To accomplish this, the Act allows providers to create ACOs that will be held accountable for improving the health and experience of care for individuals, improving the health  of populations, and reducing the rate of growth in health care spending.  Studies show that better care often costs less, because coordinated care helps avoid unnecessary duplication of services and preventing medical errors.

Proposals For Assessing Quality Included in the ACO Proposed Rule:

Proposed Quality Measures:  For 2012, CMS proposes to use a number of quality measures to establish the quality performance standard ACOs must meet in order to share in savings, provided they also meet the program’s cost savings requirement. These 65 measures span five quality domains: Patient Experience of Care, Care Coordination, Patient Safety, Preventive Health, and At-Risk Population/Frail Elderly Health.   The list of proposed measures is included in the appendix to this fact sheet.

CMS considered a broad array of process and outcome measures would help in assessing an ACO’s success in delivering high-quality health care at both the individual and population levels.  Several of the proposed quality measures align with those used in other CMS quality programs, such as the Physician Quality Reporting System, the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program, and the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program. CMS also sought to align the proposed ACO quality measures with the National Quality Strategy and other Department of Health and Human Services priorities.  CMS proposes that the measures would be reported to CMS through a combination of claims submission, data collection using a tool designed for clinical quality measure reporting, and surveys.

CMS is proposing to define the first quality performance period as beginning January 1, 2012 and ending December 31, 2012.

Proposed Quality Performance Scoring:

As required by the Affordable Care Act, before an ACO can share in any savings created, it must demonstrate that it is delivering high quality care.  Thus, a calculation of the quality performance standard will indicate whether an ACO has met the quality performance goals that would allow it to be considered eligible for shared savings.  The proposed method for scoring the measures and determining the performance level that must be achieved to share in savings under the Shared Savings Program is described in the proposed rule.

CMS proposes that the performance on each measure will be scored on a linear points scale and roll up into 5 scores for each of the 5 domains. The percentage of points earned for each domain will be aggregated using an equal weighting method to arrive at a single percentage that will be applied to the maximum sharing rate for which the ACO is eligible.
For the first year of the Shared Savings Program, CMS proposes to set the quality performance standard at the reporting level. This means that during the first performance period, ACOs will be required to report the quality measures completely and accurately in order to share in savings. However, CMS proposes to still score quality in the first year for informational purposes and to help define the benchmarks for future program years. CMS proposes to set the quality performance standard at a higher level in subsequent years.

Proposed Incorporation of the Physician Quality Reporting System into the Shared Savings Program:

The Affordable Care Act allows CMS to incorporate the Physician Quality Reporting System reporting requirements and incentive payments into the Shared Savings Program. ACO participant providers/suppliers who are also Physician Quality Reporting System eligible professionals may earn the Physician Quality Reporting System incentive as a group practice under the Shared Savings Program, by meeting its quality performance standard

The Shared Savings Program NPRM will appear in the April 7, 2011 issue of the Federal Register.  CMS will accept comments on the proposed rule until June 6, 2011 and will respond to them in a final rule to be issued later this year.  The Shared Savings Program will begin operating on January 1, 2012.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

Privatize Medicare – On the Agenda in Congress

The House Republicans are putting forward a plan, drafted by Representative Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee, to cut federal spending by $4 trillion over the next decade.

Central to that plan is a proposal to end traditional Medicare.  It would turn Medicare for those currently under 55 into a “premium support”  plan where beneficiaries would choose a private insurer and the government would provide vouchers to pay the premiums, about $15,000 a year, with bigger higher support for those who are poorer or sicker.

Writing on the New York Times “Room for Debate” blog, Princeton professor  Paul Starr says: “Privatizing Medicare would enable the federal government to wash its hands of all the vexations of health-care cost containment and leave the elderly to deal with those vexations on their own.”

The competing opinion is offered by James Capretta, a former associate director of the US Office of Management and Budget who sees vouchers as a positive step toward giving beneficiaries  “more control” over what they get:  “The key is that the government’s contribution is set independently of the choice made by any one beneficiary. If Medicare participants choose a somewhat more expensive option, they will pay higher premiums. If they choose less expensive options, perhaps through a more efficient delivery system, they will pay less.”

Is the public or the Congress ready for such a radical step? Would it hold down costs?  Or move Medicare from ” one size fits all” to a system of “haves” and “have nots,”  in which some can only afford a less generous plan?

This is a discussion we all – as providers and citizens – have a stake in.

Home Care Featured on Physician Focus TV Show

Home care is the subject of April’s “Physician Focus,” a half-hour cable access television show hosted by the Massachusetts Medical Society that educates audiences about a new health or medical issue each month.

The Home Care Alliance’s Executive Director Patricia Kelleher is a guest on this month’s show, along with Robert Schreiber, M.D., Physician-in-Chief at Hebrew Senior Life and the show’s discussion examines many aspects of home health care, including who is eligible for services, the kinds of services available, and what issues need to be considered when thinking about home care for a family member.

A related press release regarding this month’s episode on home care was distributed across the state and ran in the following publications, among others:

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

HCA Welcomes New Member: A Caring Touch Corp.

The Alliance is pleased to welcome its newest member, A Caring Touch Corp., a private care agency in Newton, Massachusetts.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

Guest Post: Nicole K.

Hello everyone,

Today the Home Care Alliance of Massachusetts has graciously allowed me to guest blog on some very important regulatory issues facing home care. I am a home care nurse working in quality and compliance for one the largest home care agencies in the state. Currently, I’m a student at the Yale School of Nursing in their Nursing, Management, Policy, and Leadership program. I am completing an internship here at the Alliance and I plan to end it with a trip to the NAHC “March on Washington” conference this week.

This is a very exciting and challenging time for the industry. Home care is viewed by many as a way to safely and effectively care for people, in a financially sound way. I want to make it THE way for patient-centered care.

As the state and nation look towards care redesign in health care, home care should be at the head of the table for this conversation. Yet at the same time, proposed and enacted federal regulation will do extreme and permanent damage to home care. Currently, the certified home care industry is frantically preparing for the implementation of the Face-to-Face rule that takes effect April 1st. As Bill Dombi from NAHC stated, ” this is the most important Medicare change affecting home care in the last 20 years.”

On a positive note, one of our New England legislators, Senator Susan Collins, is actively working to propel forward a bill that would create greater access to home care for our sickest patients. These are the patients that can’t easily visit a physician’s office due to serious and chronic medical conditions. Senator Collins’ Home Health Care Planning Improvement Act of 2011 (S.227) would allow nurse practitioners and physicians assistants, among others, to order home care. While in Washington, I plan on speaking to any legislator who will listen to me about the damaging impact of the Face-to-Face regulation as well as the importance of passing Senator Collins’ bill. I have also lobbied remotely via telephone and using HCA-prepared emails and you can too. It’s quick and easy and makes you feel good after it’s completed.

Now is the time for all of us who work in home care or have loved ones who use home care to lobby our elected representatives to advocate for the preservation of home care.

Thank You!

Nicole K.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.