The Case Against a Medicare Home Health Copayment

At our recent meeting with representatives from our state’s  Congressional delegation, Rey Spadoni, President/CEO of the VNA of Boston made some important remarks on the perils presented to home care patients should the MEDPAC proposal – presented to Congress in March –  for a per episode copayment to be enacted on home health services.  Calling copayments “short-sighted” and “ineffective,  Rey has this to say about the reaction from his staff in the field:

When our nurses, who care for patients in the poorest neighborhoods of Boston, hear about this suggestion… they roll their eyes and tell us that most… most… of their patients will not pay them. They will prioritize paying for their prescriptions, their rent and food before they will pay for home care services. For most of our patients, age 80 and above, they are already spending 30% of their limited incomes on uncovered medical care.

The battle to stop a home care copayment  has been successfully fought by this industry before. But this year, it feels a little different. MEDPAC’s copayment call has been embraced by the Congressional Budget Office; and with talk of major Medicare reform on at least the Tea Party’s agenda, copayments in the name of more “personal responsibility” for health care purchasing may have a new and receptive audience.

Although the President resisted the recommendation in his budget proposal, it is clear that this possible wave of change will need “all hands on deck” to stop.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

CMS Releases Proposed Rule on ACOs

A proposed rule has been released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for comment regarding the formation of Accountable Care Organizations or ACO’s, which create incentives for health care providers to work together to treat an individual patient across care settings.

Section 3022 of the Affordable Care Act created the Medicare Shared Savings Program that is intended to encourage providers of services and suppliers to create a new type of health care entity, which the statute calls an Accountable Care Organization. The proposed rule mentions home health, but it is important that comments on the rule are submitted to ensure that home health agencies are active participants in every ACO. Given the ACO initiative’s mission of caring for patients more efficiently and at a lower cost, this is an excellent opportunity for agencies to speak up.

The proposed rule was released on March 31 and comments will be accepted by CMS for 60 days.  You can comment:

  • By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following address ONLY:

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services,
Attention: CMS-1345-P,
P.O. Box 8013,
Baltimore, MD 21244-8013.

Below is the full announcement from CMS on the Medicare Shared Savings Program that includes a summery of the Affordable Care Act provision on ACO’s and some information from the proposed rule.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED RULE PROVISIONS FOR ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS UNDER THE MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS PROGRAM

Overview

On March 31, 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), proposed new rules under the Affordable Care Act to help doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers better coordinate care for Medicare patients through Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).  ACOs create incentives for health care providers to work together to treat an individual patient across care settings – including doctor’s offices, hospitals, and long-term care facilities.  The Medicare Shared Savings Program will reward ACOs that lower growth in health care costs while meeting performance standards on quality of care and putting patients first.  Patient and provider participation in an ACO is purely voluntary.

In developing the proposed rule, CMS has worked closely with agencies across the Federal government to ensure a coordinated and aligned inter- and intra-agency effort to facilitate implementation of the Medicare Shared Savings Program (Shared Savings Program).

This fact sheet describes the proposals addressing the proposals for what ACOs are, how they can be created, and other general topics.  CMS has posted separate fact sheets on its web site to address in greater detail specific aspects of the proposed rule, such as the quality measures and performance scoring.

There will be a 60 day public comment period on this proposed rule. CMS encourages all interested members of the public, including providers, suppliers, and Medicare beneficiaries to submit comments so that CMS can consider them as it develops final regulations on the program.

Background:

Section 3022 of the Affordable Care Act, added a new section 1899 to the Social Security Act (the Act) that requires the Secretary to establish the Shared Savings Program by January 1, 2012.  This program is intended to encourage providers of services and suppliers (e.g., physicians, hospitals and others involved in patient care) to create a new type of health care entity, which the statute calls an “Accountable Care Organization (ACO)” that agrees to be held accountable for improving the health and experience of care for individuals and improving the health of populations while reducing the rate of growth in health care spending.  Studies have shown that better care often costs less, because coordinated care helps to ensure that the patient receives the right care at the right time, with the goal of avoiding unnecessary duplication of services and preventing medical errors.

ACOs and the Medicare Beneficiary:

An ACO provides an opportunity for Medicare beneficiaries to receive high quality evidence-based health care that eliminates waste and reduces excessive costs through improved care delivery.   However, there would be significant differences between ACOs, as described in the proposed rule and the private managed care plans offered under the Medicare Advantage program.  Beneficiaries would not enroll in a specific ACO.  Instead the proposed rule calls for Medicare to take a retrospective look at the beneficiary’s use of services to determine whether a particular ACO should be credited with improving care and reducing expenditures.  This means that an ACO would have an incentive to improve the quality of care for all patients seen by its member providers and suppliers.

The proposed rule would require providers participating in an ACO to notify the beneficiary that they are participating in an ACO, and that the provider will be eligible for additional Medicare payments for improving the quality of care the beneficiary receives while reducing overall costs or may be financially responsible to Medicare for failing to provide efficient, cost-effective care.  The beneficiary may then choose to receive services from the provider or seek care from another provider that is not part of the ACO.

The proposed rule would also require each provider in an ACO to notify the beneficiary that the beneficiary’s claims data may be shared with the ACO. This data sharing is intended to make it easier to coordinate the beneficiary’s care; however, the provider may not require a beneficiary to obtain services from another provider or supplier in the same ACO.  The provider must give the beneficiary the opportunity to opt-out of those data sharing arrangements.  For Medicare beneficiaries who choose not to opt-out of the data sharing arrangements, the proposed rule would limit data sharing to the purposes of the Shared Savings Program and would require compliance with applicable   privacy rules and regulations, including the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).

Proposed eligibility requirements for an ACO:

Under the proposed rule, an ACO refers to a group of providers and suppliers of services (e.g., hospitals, physicians, and others involved in patient care) that will work together to coordinate care for the Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries they serve. The goal of an ACO is to deliver seamless, high quality care for Medicare beneficiaries, instead of the fragmented care that has so often been part of fee-for-service health care.  The ACO would be a patient-centered organization where the patient and providers are true partners in care decisions.

The Affordable Care Act specifies that an ACO may include the following types of groups of providers and suppliers of Medicare-covered services:

  • ACO professionals (i.e., physicians and hospitals meeting the statutory definition) in group practice arrangements,
  • Networks of individual practices of ACO professionals,
  • Partnerships or joint ventures arrangements between hospitals and ACO professionals, or
  • Hospitals employing ACO professionals.
  • Other Medicare providers and suppliers as determined by the Secretary

In the proposed rule, the Secretary has used her discretion to add certain critical access hospitals as eligible to participate in the Shared Savings Program.

The statute also requires each ACO to establish a governing body representing ACO providers of services and suppliers and Medicare beneficiaries. The proposed rule would make each ACO responsible for routine self-assessment, monitoring and reporting of the care it delivers.

To participate in the Shared Savings Program, the proposed rule would require an ACO to complete an application providing the information requested by CMS, including how the ACO plans to deliver high quality care at lower costs for the beneficiaries it serves.  As proposed, the ACO must agree to accept responsibility for at least 5,000 beneficiaries.  If the application is approved, the ACO must sign an agreement with CMS to participate in the Shared Savings Program for a period of three years.   An ACO will not be automatically accepted into the Shared Savings Program.

The proposed rule outlines a monitoring plan that includes analyzing claims and specific financial and quality data as well as the quarterly and annual aggregated reports, performing site visits, and performing beneficiary surveys.

Under the proposed rule, there are a number of circumstances under which CMS may terminate the agreement with an ACO, including avoidance of at risk beneficiaries and failure to meet the quality performance standards.

Tying payment to improved care at lower cost:

Under the proposed rule, Medicare would continue to pay individual providers and suppliers for specific items and services as it currently does under the fee-for-service payment systems.  The proposed rule would require CMS to develop a benchmark for savings to be achieved by each ACO if the ACO is to receive shared savings, or be held liable for losses.  Additionally, an ACO would be accountable for meeting or exceeding the quality performance standards to be eligible to receive any shared savings.

The proposed rule would establish quality performance measures and a methodology for linking quality and financial performance that will set a high bar on delivering coordinated and patient-centered care by ACOs, and emphasize continuous improvement around the three-part aim of better care for individuals, better health for populations, and lower growth in expenditures.  The proposed rule would require the ACO to have in place procedures and processes to promote evidence-based medicine and beneficiary engagement in their care.  The proposed rule would require ACOs to report quality measures to CMS and give timely feedback to providers.  CMS expects that ACOs will invest continually in the workforce and in team-based care. To assure program transparency, the proposed rule would require ACOs to publicly report certain aspects of their performance and operations.

Under the proposed rule, an ACO that meets the program’s quality performance standards would be eligible to receive a share of the savings it generates below a specific expenditure benchmark that would be set by CMS for each ACO. The proposed rule would also hold ACOs accountable for downside risk by requiring ACOs to repay Medicare for a portion of losses (expenditures above its benchmark). To provide an entry point for organizations with varied levels of experience with and willingness to take on risk, the proposed rule would allow an ACO to choose one of two program tracks.  The first track would allow an ACO to operate on a shared savings only track for the first two years, but would then require the ACO to assume the risk for shared losses in the third year.  The second track would allow ACOs to share in savings and risk liability for losses beginning in their first performance year, in return for a higher share of any savings it generates.

The Shared Savings Program NPRM will appear in the April 7, 2011 issue of the Federal Register.  CMS will accept comments on the proposed rule until June 6, 2011, and will respond to them in a final rule to be issued later this year.  The Shared Savings Program will begin operating on January 1, 2012.

Please Note: Once the regulation is published on (April 7, 2011) the preceding link will be deactivated and the published version of the regulation will be available on the National Archives website at

http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/news.html.

*************************************************************

IMPROVING QUALITY OF CARE FOR MEDICARE PATIENTS: ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS

On March 31, 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), proposed new rules under the Affordable Care Act to help doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers better coordinate care for Medicare patients through Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).  ACOs create incentives for health care providers to work together to treat an individual patient across care settings – including doctor’s offices, hospitals, and long-term care facilities.  The Medicare Shared Savings Program will reward ACOs that lower growth in health care costs while meeting performance standards on quality of care and putting patients first.  Patient and provider participation in an ACO is purely voluntary.

This fact sheet describes the proposals to ensure that ACOs provide high quality care, including proposed quality measures, and a proposed method for scoring the performance of the ACO for purposes of the Shared Savings Program. There will be a 60 day public comment period on this proposed rule. CMS encourages all interested members of the public, including providers, suppliers, and Medicare beneficiaries to submit comments so that CMS can consider them as it develops final regulations on the program.

Background:

The Medicare Shared Savings Program, which is to be implemented on January 1, 2012, is intended to encourage providers of services and suppliers (e.g., physicians, hospitals and others involved in patient care) to coordinate patient care and improve communications with each other to get each beneficiary the right care at the right time, and see that the care is provided right the first time.  To accomplish this, the Act allows providers to create ACOs that will be held accountable for improving the health and experience of care for individuals, improving the health  of populations, and reducing the rate of growth in health care spending.  Studies show that better care often costs less, because coordinated care helps avoid unnecessary duplication of services and preventing medical errors.

Proposals For Assessing Quality Included in the ACO Proposed Rule:

Proposed Quality Measures:  For 2012, CMS proposes to use a number of quality measures to establish the quality performance standard ACOs must meet in order to share in savings, provided they also meet the program’s cost savings requirement. These 65 measures span five quality domains: Patient Experience of Care, Care Coordination, Patient Safety, Preventive Health, and At-Risk Population/Frail Elderly Health.   The list of proposed measures is included in the appendix to this fact sheet.

CMS considered a broad array of process and outcome measures would help in assessing an ACO’s success in delivering high-quality health care at both the individual and population levels.  Several of the proposed quality measures align with those used in other CMS quality programs, such as the Physician Quality Reporting System, the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program, and the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program. CMS also sought to align the proposed ACO quality measures with the National Quality Strategy and other Department of Health and Human Services priorities.  CMS proposes that the measures would be reported to CMS through a combination of claims submission, data collection using a tool designed for clinical quality measure reporting, and surveys.

CMS is proposing to define the first quality performance period as beginning January 1, 2012 and ending December 31, 2012.

Proposed Quality Performance Scoring:

As required by the Affordable Care Act, before an ACO can share in any savings created, it must demonstrate that it is delivering high quality care.  Thus, a calculation of the quality performance standard will indicate whether an ACO has met the quality performance goals that would allow it to be considered eligible for shared savings.  The proposed method for scoring the measures and determining the performance level that must be achieved to share in savings under the Shared Savings Program is described in the proposed rule.

CMS proposes that the performance on each measure will be scored on a linear points scale and roll up into 5 scores for each of the 5 domains. The percentage of points earned for each domain will be aggregated using an equal weighting method to arrive at a single percentage that will be applied to the maximum sharing rate for which the ACO is eligible.
For the first year of the Shared Savings Program, CMS proposes to set the quality performance standard at the reporting level. This means that during the first performance period, ACOs will be required to report the quality measures completely and accurately in order to share in savings. However, CMS proposes to still score quality in the first year for informational purposes and to help define the benchmarks for future program years. CMS proposes to set the quality performance standard at a higher level in subsequent years.

Proposed Incorporation of the Physician Quality Reporting System into the Shared Savings Program:

The Affordable Care Act allows CMS to incorporate the Physician Quality Reporting System reporting requirements and incentive payments into the Shared Savings Program. ACO participant providers/suppliers who are also Physician Quality Reporting System eligible professionals may earn the Physician Quality Reporting System incentive as a group practice under the Shared Savings Program, by meeting its quality performance standard

The Shared Savings Program NPRM will appear in the April 7, 2011 issue of the Federal Register.  CMS will accept comments on the proposed rule until June 6, 2011 and will respond to them in a final rule to be issued later this year.  The Shared Savings Program will begin operating on January 1, 2012.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

Physician Face-to-Face Encounter Update: New Q&As

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have posted new guidance regarding the physician face-to-face requirement in order for patients to receive Medicare home health services.

Questions & Answers have been updated periodically by CMS and a new round has just been made available.

The new Q&A’s include:

Also, if you are from a home health agency and have not already done so, please comment on a national Face-to-Face Encounter Requirement Survey. Your feedback on whether the report reflects the issues your agency is facing will be instrumental in the Home Care Alliance’s advocacy and meetings with federal elected officials taking place at the end of March. You can comment on this newsfeed post or email James Fuccione at HCA.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

Patrick Administration Postpones ADH Rate Cuts, Services Still in Jeopardy

Officials in Governor Deval Patrick’s Administration announced that rate cuts that would have taken effect today (Tuesday, March 15) to Adult Day Health, Adult Foster Care, and Day Habilitation Programs would be “postponed indefinitely.”

Those rate cuts amounted to a total of $10 million for the three programs, but there is still the danger of the much larger $55 million cut to Adult Day Health Services that would eliminate the “Basic” service category. A special advocacy day is planned for March 22 at the State House and any interested agencies offering Adult Day Health services are invited to attend. More information on the event is available here.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

CMS Clarifies use of HHABN for Face-to-Face Requirement

On the CMS Home Health, Hospice & DME Open Door Forum held today, March 2nd.,  staff from CMS discussed the use of the HHABN when discharging a patient because there was no F2F encounter within the required time frame.  This is a clarification of an earlier policy which said that the HHABN was not to be used in this situation.

Option BOX 2 can be used because the agency is ending services for administrative reasons such as lack of a F2F encounter.  It is a change of care notice only and there is no beneficiary liability for the care provided. Further written clarification from CMS will be forthcoming.

Physician Face to Face Encounter Update

The Home Care Alliance wrote an article in the Massachusetts Medical Society’s newsletter in an effort to further educate physicians on the CMS face-to-face encounter requirement. The article was written at the beginning of the year and published in the February edition of “Vital Signs,” the MMS newsletter, although much has happened since then.

With one month left until the April 1st enforcement deadline, the Alliance continues to provide updates as they become available. To that end, some new important Q&A’s have been posted on the CMS website, which are available here.

A few of the new Q&A’s are listed below:

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

Regulatory Review

Expedited Review Process:

Masspro completed a series of workshops to discuss the “expedited review process,” used by home health agencies to notify Medicare beneficiaries that their Medicare services are ending. There are two separate forms and slightly different rules depending on Medicare “fee-for-service” (Notice of Medicare provider Non-Coverage) or Medicare Advantage (Notice of Medicare non-Coverage).  These forms are to be used when all Medicare services are ending for medical reasons.  If care is ending for a technical reason such as homebound, then the beneficiary is given a HHABN.  This is a recent clarification from Quest to Masspro our local QIO.

Quest is the part of the Quality Net system that QIO’s use to communicate with CMS.  QIO’s can ask Quest questions that require clarification by CMS and then publish the answers.

Is it appropriate for the HHA to issue a Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage in these types of cases, and for the QIO to review?

Answer:

It is not appropriate for HHAs to issue Notices of non-coverage for home-bound status; only when it is believed that the beneficiary no longer requires a skilled level of care

Face-to-Face:

CMS put out a transmittal a few weeks ago to define several dates that relate to the Face-to-face Requirement.

The effective date is January 1, 2011

The implementation date that CMS contractors must have their systems ready is March 10, 2011

The enforcement date is April 1, 2011. After this date, agencies will not be reimbursed if the F2F documentation is not present in the medical record.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

More Face To Face Clarifications Issued

The following was issued by NAHC Regulatory Affairs

CMS issued an update to the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Pub 100-02 Chapter 7 via a Transmittal issued this afternoon at: http://www.cms.gov/transmittals/downloads/R139BP.pdf. Summarized below are new pieces of information (including exception in case of death of patient) and clarifications found in the Transmittal.

General Issues

  • The certifying physician must document that he or she or an allowed non-physician practitioner (NPP) had a face-to-face encounter with the patient.
  • Certain NPPs may perform the face-to-face encounter and inform the certifying physician regarding the clinical findings exhibited by the patient during the encounter. However, the certifying physician must document the encounter and sign the certification.
  • The documentation must include the date when the physician or allowed NPP saw the patient, and a brief narrative composed by the certifying physician who describes how the patient’s clinical condition as seen during that encounter supports the patient’s homebound status and need for skilled services on the certification or an addendum to the certification.
  • It is acceptable for the certifying physician to dictate the documentation content to one of the physician’s support personnel to type.
  • It is also acceptable for the documentation to be generated from a physician’s electronic health record.
  • It is unacceptable for the physician to verbally communicate the encounter to the HHA, where the HHA would then document the encounter as part of the certification for the physician to sign.

Exceptional Circumstances in Case of Death:

  • · When a home health patient dies shortly after admission, before the face-to-face encounter occurs, if the contractor determines a good faith effort existed on the part of the HHA to facilitate/coordinate the encounter and if all other certification requirements are met, the certification is deemed to be complete.

Hospitalist Role

  • A physician who attended to the patient in an acute or post-acute setting, but does not follow the patient in the community (such as a hospitalist) may certify the need for home health care based on his/her contact with the patient, and establish and sign the plan of care. The acute/post-acute physician would then transfer/hand off the patient’s care to a designated community-based physician who assumes care for the patient.
  • Or, A physician who attended to the patient in an acute or post-acute setting may certify the need for home health care based on his/her contact with the patient, initiate the orders for home health services, and transfer the patient to a designated community-based physician to review and sign off on the plan of care.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

New Face-to-Face Encounter Rule Q&As from CMS

Another new round of Q&A’s have been posted on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid’s website regarding the face-to-face encounter rule, which is set to be enforced on April 1, 2011.

The website with all questions and answers are available here, and below are a few of the newest Q&A’s that have been posted:

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.

CMS Soliciting Input on Value-Based Purchasing for HHAs

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will be hosting an “Open Door Forum“on designing a value-based purchasing program for home health agencies. The forum is intended to solicit input from all parties interested in implementing such a program.

CMS Special Open Door Forum

Designing A Home Health Value Based Purchasing Program

Thursday, February 24th from 1:30-3:00pm (Conference call only)

Value-based purchasing (VBP) is meant to link payment more directly to the quality of care provided and is along the same lines of other payment reform efforts seeking to reward providers for delivering high quality and efficient clinical care.

Section 3006 of the Affordable Care Act requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to develop a plan to implement a value-based purchasing program for payments to home health agencies under the Medicare program.

CMS will be seeking stakeholder input on a number of topics defined in the statute including:

  • The ongoing development, selection, and modification process for measures of quality and efficiency;
  • The reporting, collection, and validation of quality data;
  • The structure of value-based payment adjustments, including the determination of thresholds or improvements in quality, the size of such payments, and the sources of funding for the value-based bonus payments;
  • Methods for the public disclosure of information on the performance of home health agencies;
  • and any other issues.

If you wish to participate on Feb 24th, dial 1-800-837-1935 – Conference ID 37941789.

More information on this and other CMS Open Door Forums is available here.

Return to www.thinkhomecare.org.